For the latest version of this document, click here: www.biblepages.net/roa171.htm
Many people have wondered about the temple and the sacrifices which are mentioned in the book of Ezekiel, chapters 40–48. What did those things actually refer to, in the vision the prophet Ezekiel saw?
Various commentators have presented many kinds of theories in regard to that matter. And indeed, it is difficult to understand what time and circumstances the last chapters of that book really might have pointed to. They talk about a large temple, including a detailed description of it and the area around it. More: Those chapters talk about priestly duties of the old-covenantal kind, including animal sacrifices. Further: The way those chapters are commonly translated, makes it seem that such things are to be done in the future. The problem, of course, is this: How could Ezekiel’s temple and the things connected to it, fit within the frame of the New Covenant which does not have any such sacrifices?
Some writers have seen in those chapters a “gospel temple, erected by Jesus and the apostles” – whatever such a “gospel-temple” might be. Some others have claimed that they refer to “the Christian church in its earthly glory and blessing”. (Often, writers or preachers of that kind might claim their own church [a] to be “the Temple of God”.)
a The articles rga062.htm and raa012.htm have some notes on the word and concept “church”. The article raa042.htm contains a study on the matter of “worship”.
Then, some have claimed that Ezekiel 40–48 “symbolically describes the kingdom of God in its final form”. [b] Some, when looking for an explanation for those chapters, have suggested that they might be a description of an “idealised copy” of the temple which was destroyed in 586 BCE. Perhaps they have assumed that the huge temple which the prophet saw in a vision, was something the Jews who returned from the captivity in Babylon should have built but failed to do, so that only a smaller temple was built.
b The article roa012.htm considers what, when and where the Kingdom of God, perhaps better called the Reign of God, really is.
And so commentators go on, presenting many different kinds of ideas and claims regarding Ezekiel’s temple with its sacrifices, and the meaning of those nine chapters in general.
Then, some might suggest that what is described in those nine chapters, perhaps refers to things in the heavenly land [c], and the heavenly city and temple which are mentioned in several bible-passages. For, it is clear that the temple in Jerusalem, and the portable sanctuary before that, were only types of something heavenly – not exact copies, but symbolic representations of things in Heaven.
c Just as the earthly Jerusalem was a type of a City of God in Heaven, even the earthly Promised Land served as a symbol of a Promised Land in Heaven. Hebrews 11:16 and many other scriptures point to that heavenly land. The articles rba043.htm and rxa103.htm have some notes on this.
It appears that each side of the temple area (court) was circa 1800 metres long, and that the city was circa 65 kilometres in circumference. Here are two of the relevant passages.
Ezekiel 42:20 He measured it by the four sides: it had a wall round about, five hundred reeds long, and five hundred broad, to make a separation between the sanctuary and the profane place. (AKJV)
Ezekiel 48:35 It was round about eighteen thousand measures: and the name of the city from that day shall be, The Lord is there. (AKJV)
Ezekiel 42:20 shows that each side of the temple court was five hundred “reeds” long. Ezekiel 40:5 shows that the measuring reed in question was six cubits long, and that those cubits were a hand-breadth longer than normal. A normal cubit is the length of a man’s forearm, circa 0.5 metres, and so, that “long cubit” was circa 0.6 metres. Thus, that measuring reed was 3.6 metres long. 500 × 3.6 metres = 1800 metres. A temple court of that size would be many times larger than the parcel where the temple in Jerusalem was located. Much of Jerusalem of Old Testament times would have had to be torn down, in order to give place for such a large temple site.
And then, regarding the city around the temple area in that vision: Its circumference was 18000 × 6 “long cubits” (which were 0.6 metres long). That is 108000 “long cubits”, equalling to around 65 kilometres. This means that if that city was round in its form, it would have been more than 20 kilometres in diameter. So, the city which the prophet saw in his vision, was much larger than Jerusalem of Old Testament times.
Ezekiel 40: The city was described as being “on a very high mountain” (verse 2), “in the land of Israel”. There was also a river there (chapter 47).
A note: Hebrews 12 shows that the New Covenant’s “mount Zion” is a heavenly city. (The article rba043.htm has more on this.) And then: A city belongs to a land. Hebrews 11:13–16 talks about the heavenly land and city which the faithful people of old looked forward to. (Verse 16, HCSB, “But they now aspire to a better land—a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for He has prepared a city for them.”)
Then, we have the book of Revelation which records a vision the apostle John saw: A city with a river which has “water of life” (Revelation 22:1). John saw even visions regarding a heavenly temple. A note: Even though the measurements of the temple which John saw in his visions (Revelation 21) might appear to differ from those in Ezekiel’s vision, one must not draw all too hasty conclusions out of that; even “experts” have come to widely different conclusions in regard to that matter. So, is the city which is described in Ezekiel 40–48, the same as the one which is mentioned in Revelation 22 and Hebrews 11? Perhaps, perhaps not. We do not have any certain answer to that question.
Several passages in chapters 40 to 48 appear to talk about a mortal priesthood and slaughtering of animals and burning parts of them. The question is, how could those sacrificial things fit within the frame of the New Covenant which does not have any such sacrifices? For, after all, when Jesus made his Sacrifice by giving his life in place of others, that put an end to all sacrificing. The Old Covenant and its offerings (sacrifices) were mere symbols which pointed to Jesus and his Sacrifice and the New Covenant which was to come. – Let us consider something the apostle Paul wrote to some Jewish believers. He used complicated language with symbols and with allusions to the Old Testament, so please read the following scripture-quote slowly and with care.
Hebrews 9:28 so Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many. To those who eagerly wait for Him He will appear a second time, apart from sin, for salvation. Hebrews 10:1 For the law, having a shadow of the good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with these same sacrifices, which they offer continually year by year, make those who approach perfect. 2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? For the worshipers, once purified, would have had no more consciousness of sins. 3 But in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. 4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins. 5 Therefore, when He came into the world, He said: “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, But a body You have prepared for Me. 6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You had no pleasure. 7 Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come—In the volume of the book it is written of Me—To do Your will, O God.’” 8 Previously saying, “Sacrifice and offering, burnt offerings, and offerings for sin You did not desire, nor had pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the law), 9 then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.” He takes away the first that He may establish the second. 10 By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. 11 And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12 But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, 13 from that time waiting till His enemies are made His footstool. 14 For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified. (NKJV, highlighting added)
Many other bible-passages refer to the same matter.
So, were it so that the sanctuary described in Ezekiel 40–48 would be something that is to be built at some still future time, then we would have a logical problem. For, several passages in those nine chapters talk about Levite priests (descendants of Zadok, see Ezekiel 40:46, 43:19, 44:15, 48:11) making burnt offerings and so on – but again, the New Covenant does not have any sacrifices (offerings), other than the one that Jesus made when he gave his life in place of others.
Was it something that the Jews who returned from Babylon, should have built, but failed, so that they built only a much smaller temple? Some have suggested this, but that theory is quite far-fetched, because only some fifty thousand Jews (or Jewish men) returned, see Ezra 2:64–65. They were so few that it does not seem likely that God would have expected them to produce a city and a temple of such great size as chapters 40 to 48 describe. It does not seem likely that they would have had the means and strength for a so large project, not even if they would have gotten the help which is mentioned in Ezra 6. In short: It appears that the book of Ezra, and Ezekiel 40–48, do not talk about the same temple.
Or, could it for some reason be so that after Jesus’ return there will once again be a temple with a mortal priesthood and animal sacrifices? Obviously not.
Or, are the last chapters in the book of Ezekiel a hoax, a spurious addition? It is true that prophet Ezekiel and his book are not quoted or even mentioned in the other books of the Bible, but that does not have to mean that Ezekiel’s book, or parts of it, would be spurious.
Or, was the mention of the temple and the sacrifices in the prophet’s visions, Ezekiel 40–48, a symbolic description of things in the heavenly realm? (Often, things seen in visions are symbols, and not literal presentations of something.) It could be so, and is perhaps even likely, but again, we do not have any certain answer to that question.
One thing is clear: There remains no sacrificing to be done. When Jesus made his Sacrifice by giving his life in place of others, that put an end to sacrifices (offerings). At that time, even the Old Covenant came to its end. It was a temporary arrangement which was to last “until the Offspring would come to whom the promise had been made”, Galatians 3:19 – that is, until Jesus came. The article rca082.htm has more on this.
A note: Some people might have problems with the fact that the Old Covenant was a temporary arrangement. This is because many translators have put into certain Old Testament passages wordings which make it seem that the Old Covenant was to be “everlasting”. The article rca132.htm sorts out that matter.
See also the “recommended reading” section, below.
Please tell others about this site. Please also link to it. The address to the table of contents page is biblepages.net/contents.htm
An explanation of the short names for the bible-translations that are quoted or mentioned at this site. → rsa092.htm
The origin and meaning of the word “church”. → rga062.htm
Matthew 16:18, “I will build my assembly, and the gates of hades shall not prevail against it”. What and where is the ekklêsia or assembly which Jesus said he would form? Is it an earthly religious organisation as some claim, or something else? → raa012.htm
Worshipping God. What does the Bible say about worship, in connection with the New Covenant? → raa042.htm
What is the Kingdom of God? Where is it located? Does it exist already, or is it only going to be established in the future? Or, is it merely something “in the hearts of men”? → roa012.htm
What does the Bible say about Heaven? Were the saints to go there? What about others? What does it look like, in Heaven? → rba043.htm
Hebrews 4:9, the sabbatismos or rest which the saints were to enter – a clarification of its actual nature. → rxa103.htm
On Galatians 3:17–19 and what the apostle Paul meant by “added law”. → rca082.htm
Some notes on how bible-translations mislead, by making it seem that the Old Covenant was to be “everlasting”. On the word olam in the Hebrew text of the Old Testament. → rca132.htm
On the King James version. The story behind king James’ bible, including the men who were involved in producing it. → rsa032.htm
Table of contents – Key-word index – Search function – On the goal and purpose of this site
Quoting: You can quote shorter passages in the articles at this site, provided that you mention the source by stating the full internet address (URL) to the article in question. Include also a date.
Sharing with others: You may not re-publish any part of the contents of this site, as a booklet, brochure or on the internet or in other ways; the author retains the copyright ©. But, you can send copies of the documents at this site, for instance to a friend. Often, the best way to do this is to send that person the internet address to the relevant page or pages. You can even give paper-copies to others, provided that you print the document in question in full, in the form it appears on this site, including the address and date at its end. Always get the latest document version, directly from this site.
For more on quoting and sharing with others, see the page rpa032.htm.
This site is not connected to any church or religious organisation. It looks at things from a biblical perspective and not from a dogmatic one. Regarding its goal and purpose, see the page rpa032.htm.
For the latest version of this document, click here: www.biblepages.net/roa171.htm
Download the latest copy of this whole site, for offline use: www.biblepages.net/rpa042.htm
Please tell others about this site. Please also link to it.
This document was created or modified 2019–07–20. ©